Publications

Why I Turned Adblock Off

I think the real cost of an ad blocker is not the ads you get back — it is the half-pages and the lost feedback loop. Here is why I left it off.

Guide

Why I Turned Adblock Off

Type
Page
Best use
Use this page as part of the wider site context.
By Arda Akgül September 22, 2026 Technology & Public Life

TL;DR: I think ad blockers started as a performance tweak and hardened into identity. Of course I block ads, everyone I respect blocks ads — that was the default sentence in my head for the better part of a decade. Then I spent a week testing how my own writing looked on phones and on a fresh profile, left …

I think ad blockers started as a performance tweak and hardened into identity. Of course I block ads, everyone I respect blocks ads — that was the default sentence in my head for the better part of a decade. Then I spent a week testing how my own writing looked on phones and on a fresh profile, left the extension off “temporarily,” and the week ended with the toolbar still empty of activity.

What surprised me was not the ads I got back. It was the sites that stopped looking broken.

Half-pages are worse than banners

Consent dialogs finished their logic. Layout slots filled instead of collapsing. Embedded players and read-later tools no longer depended on a whitelist I had forgotten I curated.

The IAB Europe Transparency and Consent Framework describes how publishers, vendors, and browsers are supposed to coordinate these requests. In theory that is plumbing. In practice, blocking the plumbing left me debugging other people’s sites during ordinary reading sessions.

Some people prefer a quieter canvas and will trade breakage for it. I understand that reaction. But I also think there is something intellectually interesting here: the exception list had become a second hobby, and the hobby was costing me complete pages. Frictionless loading of a full layout beats a pristine page that needs three reloads and a guessed rule.

Relevance needs a feedback loop

Publishers can see which pieces get finished when measurement runs. That feedback loop is how headlines settle down and how topic pages improve. With the blocker on, I was a visitor who left no usable signal — correct in my own eyes, invisible in the stats that shape what gets published next.

I do not argue that every ad unit is a public good. I think the real point is simpler: once you remove the loop, you also remove your own small vote on what gets better. Whether that trade is worth it is a different question. For me, after a week of cleaner layouts and recommendations that matched what I actually read, it was not.

The blocker is still installed. It is simply off. That turned out to be the most low-maintenance position available — and honestly, the least interesting as an identity, which suits me better.

References

IAB Europe. (n.d.). Transparency & Consent Framework. https://iabeurope.eu/transparency-consent-framework/

International World Wide Web Consortium. (n.d.). Tracking Preference Expression (DNT). https://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Why did you stop using an ad blocker?
I needed several sites to behave exactly as normal visitors experienced them for a week of testing. Once layouts stopped breaking and recommendations matched what I actually read, staying unblocked felt simpler than maintaining the exception list.
Doesn't a blocker make the web cleaner?
It removes noise, but it also removes parts of pages that depend on those requests — consent flows, embedded tools, paywall logic, and layout slots. I traded a little noise for fewer half-rendered pages.
How do you handle unwanted content now?
I close tabs, mute sites I do not finish, and let relevance improve where publishers can measure what readers finish. It is a coarser filter than a blocker, and it has been enough.